"Freedom itself was attacked this morning by a faceless coward, and freedom will be defended." ~ George W. Bush, September 11, 2001
We have heard it repeated loudly and continuously since 9/11 – the troops are defending our freedoms. This claim is made so often and by so many different segments of society that it has become another meaningless national dictum – like "God Bless America" or "In God We Trust."
This cliché is actually quite insidious. It is used as a mantra to justify or excuse anything the U.S. military does.
U.S. troops are engaged in unconstitutional, undeclared wars – but the troops are defending our freedoms. U.S. drone strikes killed civilians in Pakistan – but the troops are defending our freedoms. U.S. bombs landed on a wedding party in Afghanistan – but the troops are defending our freedoms. U.S. soldiers murdered Afghan civilians and kept some of their body parts – but the troops are defending our freedoms. U.S. helicopter pilots gunned down Iraqi civilians – but the troops are defending our freedoms. U.S. soldiers killed civilians for sport – but the troops are defending our freedoms. U.S. troops carelessly killed civilians and then covered it up – but the troops are defending our freedoms.
But as I have pointed out many times in my articles on the military, and others like Jacob Hornberger of the Future of Freedom Foundation have been arguing for years (see here and here), the troops are doing everything but defending our freedoms. In fact, the more the troops defend our freedoms by bombing, invading, and occupying other countries, the more enemies they make of the United States and the more our freedoms get taken away in the name of "fighting terrorism" or "national security."
Read More→
Tags:
free market,
free society,
freedom,
libertarianism,
militarism,
statism
According to Pope Benedict, “The economy cannot be measured by the maximum profit but by the common good.”
I’m still waiting for him, or anyone else, to explain exactly how one measures the common good. Should we measure it in median income, chicken dinners per household, or perhaps dinners per chicken coop?
Come to think of it, one cannot “measure the economy” at all; neither by the common good nor by maximum profit. Maximum profit is only a useful measure for a private enterprise. It is the key measure to know whether the company is producing more value than it is costing. Every company should aim for this goal. The economy as a whole is an impossible and meaningless aggregate like GDP and is used for political aims, not economic gains.
He continues, “The economy cannot function only with mercantile self-regulation but needs an ethical reason in order to work for man,” But this fails to realize that these interests are one and the same. It is ethical and necessary for man to work because God commands us not to take from others. In our pursuit of profits the market is regulated by supply and demand. This is not a “self” regulation but a product of the free market system. Nowhere, this side of heaven, will people “self-regulate” their actions.
Tom Woods, a vocal Catholic and Austrian economist, has written a great book on the church and the free market. I wish the Pope would read it.
Editor’s Note: Although we think the Pope is completely wrong on this issue, we do not wish to be disparaging in total. (The alliteration was clever, though, don’t you think?) We will freely criticize leaders of any denomination who promote bad economics and seek power, and herald those who speak truth to power.
Tags:
economics,
ethics,
free market,
social justice,
society
Anthony asks a series of questions in his submission:
I might consider myself a Libertarian, except I just can’t get over that so many libertarians are atheists and against all religious expression by government. For instance, Libertarians hate Mike Huckabee for some fear of a “theocracy.” How do you address these things about your secular libertarian friends (such as Ayn Rand types)?
This question has multiple levels, and thus I want to wade carefully through the various issues wrapped in it. First off, just because there are plenty of atheist libertarians does not mean that it is a political philosophy only for atheists. On the contrary, I would argue that Christianity has lots in common with libertarianism and very little in common with statism. A philosophy that is essentially founded upon “treat others the way you want to be treated” would naturally see Christianity as favorable. See my Lessons in Liberty article for more.
As for religious expression by governments, Christian libertarians do not want to see government taking on vestments of Christianity whatsoever for two reasons: (1) the State is founded in rebellion to God and it should not be covered in Christian garb to look better than it is. We should always look to expose the State’s evils rather than “baptize” it to gain benefits; and (2) the Church universal needs to be internally protected from the trappings of the State in order to stay pure. The more governments get wrapped up in Christianity, the worse it will be for the Church.
I wouldn’t say that libertarians “hate” Huckabee because they fear theocracy (hate is a strong word anyway). Still, there is much to despise in his politics. Huckabee is a warmonger, pro-big government, pro-drug war, economically illiterate, anti-free market, anti-immigrant, and a supporter of the police state. If he supports these things because he thinks that’s what God wants, then he’s completely off his rocker and that’s worth criticizing in its own right.
I have many non-Christian, libertarian friends. Some of them love Ayn Rand, some don’t. But I have rarely had any issue in sharing my faith or dealing with sensitive topics because we have a common desire to treat others with respect. Here’s the bottom line: liberty brings people together. Libertarians come from all over the belief spectrum, but the commonality of seeking liberty transcends boundaries. As a result, you have many opportunities to live out the gospel to those around you.
********
He concluded with a statement that kind of begs a response:
Also, I can’t get over how so many Libertarians (probably not you guys) are like Barney frank on social issues but Jim DeMint on fiscal issues.
Christian libertarians do not believe that you can solve moral problems through legislation. Insofar as law exists, we seek to reduce its grasp on individual action that is not aggressive in nature. Instead, we want to use the power of social change, leveraged through the Church and local communities, to fix such problems.
Libertarians understand that the government cannot do anything right for an economy. Thus, if the government is to exist at all, it should not involve itself in anything other than the protection of basic property rights. (And many libertarians, myself included, think the State cannot even protect rights without becoming corrupt!) Hence, the government should abolish all income and property taxes and not involve itself in trade whatsoever.
Besides that, Jim DeMint is not a great example of someone being “libertarian” on fiscal issues. If you’re going to look anywhere in Congress, look to Ron Paul!
Have a question you’d like to ask? Submit yours here.
Tags:
Ayn Rand,
economics,
fiscal issues,
free market,
free speech,
government,
justice,
religious freedom,
rights,
social issues,
The State,
theocracy,
theology
For those interested in reading more about the nexus of faith and free-enterprise, a new project has been launched by the American Enterprise Institute called the Common Sense Concept. It’s homepage has the following description:
“Common Sense Concept exists at the center of a new conversation about how things should be. Many years of poverty and stories of redemption have shown what works and what doesn’t. A generation that understands these truths will, finally, transform society. Be a part of it.”
The target market is evangelical college students and young adults. I don’t know exactly how effective it will be, nor do I support every policy position take by AEI. But when they asked me to contribute to their blog, I agreed. Here’s my inaugural post. I’ll be posting responses to articles probably once or twice a month. Hopefully this will continue to advance deeper thinking about political philosophy among Christians. I encourage LCC readers to check it out and lend your always insightful comments!
Tags:
free market,
Libertarian Websites,
libertarianism
This fantastic video reminds us of how amazing the free market truly is. We should never forget how people working freely together will help lift all boats in ways no one can anticipate. Don’t let anyone tell you that God wants a socialist economy, EVER. Such thoughts are completely fallacious, and completely antithetical to how God intends for us to live together.
Freedom is the default.
(Great job Students for Liberty friend Michelle Fields as well. If I recall correctly, she is a student at Church of Christ-based Pepperdine University as well! Michelle, if you’re an LCC reader please comment so we can all brag on you a bit…)
Tags:
economics,
free market,
free society,
internet,
poverty,
wealth