May
15

Sacraments of the State

By

All States have a vested interest in clothing themselves in a religious veneer or a “civil religion,” but this does not necessarily take the form of an “official” religion such as in the European states of old or western Asian countries now. In the case of the United States, there are many of what I like to call “statist sacraments” that reinforce a kind of mythology around the centralized power of the State.

A few weeks ago, the Christian Libertarian Facebook group had a great discussion about forms of civil religion that we encounter regularly. It was such an interesting thread that I just had to record the highlights for posterity here at LCC. (I’ll add some light edits for clarity.)

The discussion began with Drew: “In just a few words or a couple sentences, please describe the worst forms of nationalism, idolatry, and/or propaganda that you encounter regularly. For example, one of my pet peeves is the idol worship of past presidents like Lincoln and such. I’m working on a new writing project and I wanted to get some your thoughts or experiences.”

Here are some of the responses:

“The idol of the dollar. People spend countless hours of their lives working for a piece of cotton while basing all their transactions with it. People devote their lives to it.”

“Worship of ‘Public Safety Personnel.’ Farmers and a few others have higher injury and fatality rate. Last I checked I can survive most days without a police officer writing a report about something bad that happened, but would be hard pressed to survive without the farmer’s production. Which job is more dangerous? Which is more important? Which actually defends my liberty? Which is most beneficial to me? The farmer whose property we steal and leave with no retirement is my advocate. The officer consumes my sustenance, depends on me for his salary and retirement and increasingly threatens my liberty as the state increases in power.”

“I would add idolatry of the [Jewish state] as well.”

“The flag, blind patriotism, and the pledge of allegiance.”

“Lincoln’s a big one. The whitewashing of Reagan galls me, too.”

“Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He got us out the Great Depression, you know.”

“Many liberals I know have said that they believe rights come from the government or ‘the people.’ Seriously disturbing.”

“Who can deny the way Americans worship the ‘Founding Fathers’? I was certainly guilty of this when I was [part of the] religious right. I think American evangelicalism in general places an emphasis on the founders that is unhealthy.” … “[The Founders] were just ordinary men who lived in an extraordinary time, but they are worshiped and some have elevated them to the level of prophets. Further, the Constitution is venerated to such a degree that, though you will be hard pressed to get any of the one’s who worship it to admit it, they view it as another book of the Bible.”

“How about political freedom as an idol?” … “Milton Friedman was a liberty-idolizer. He even said it was his ‘god’, in a manner of speaking. Worldly liberty, while I see it as the true loving ‘political’ or ‘governing’ act… free-will is [still] from God… It is God who gave us liberty. I’d much rather worship God than His creation of liberty. Even better God offers an even greater liberty from the chains of sin!”

“The god named ‘Society’ who has forced us into a contract, despite this being a complete contradiction. Its priesthood are primarily soldiers and teachers. Its church is the preferred political party.”

“One that hasn’t been mentioned yet… the worshipful singing of the national anthem before every sporting event known to man. Happens more often these days than praying before meals. What should that tell you?”

“My oldest is in preschool, and it drives me nuts that he recites the pledge of allegiance every day. I look forward to the day when he’ll be old enough to understand why he shouldn’t recite it and can decide for himself whether or not he wants to.”

“The idolatry of the American Soldier. I was majorly guilty of that one. Many people hold them to a point of Sainthood. I have a great amount of respect for them, but they are venerated in modern society — and the unfortunate indictment – modern evangelicalism.”

“Government and banks creating money from nothing is a claim to create something ex nihilo, which only God can do. This is a logically precise case of government as god… No one claims to create new physical laws. Neither can any other law be created by man. The claim to create law is a claim to be god, by government, legislators and by those who approve of the lie that men can create law.”

“Misinterpretation of Romans 13:1-7, leading to logically incoherent application of Scripture to the role of government, a term not even present in the text. This leaves Christians advocating for and self-censoring themselves in support of ungodly government, thus idolizing government.”

“Hollywood, of course. The celebrity spokesmen (and assumed authorities on all topics) for the state.” … “We Americans (indeed the whole world) WORSHIP Hollywood. Look at all the magazines and TV shows that hang on every word out of the mouth of the likes of Brat Pitt, Angelina Jolie, or George Clooney. (ad nauseum) They are considered experts on whatever cause they happen to be focusing on at the time. We gush over their clothes, hair, make up, marriages, breakups, etc. It’s sickening.”

“Don’t complain unless you are part of the political process, vote, etc, as though that its a test of genuine concern for ‘the nation.’ [In other words] worship of the political process. Also, worship of the political party, rather than seeking wisdom and standing on principle.

“The greatest idolatry, in my honest opinion, is the worship of democracy. As Hans-Hermann Hoppe said, [democracy is] ‘the god that failed’ … After all, what are governments but mere men pretending to be gods?”

That’s a lot of input! Do you have any other examples that the above discussion missed? Let us know in the comments.

Norman Horn

Norman is the founder and editor of LibertarianChristians.com. He holds a PhD in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin and a Master of Arts in Theological Studies from the Austin Graduate School of Theology.

More Posts - Website

Follow Me:
TwitterFacebookLinkedInPinterestGoogle PlusYouTubeReddit

Tags: , , ,
Categories : Articles
  • http://christianlibertarianism.wordpress.com/ Christian Libertarianism

    There’s the statue of Lincoln in a Greco-Roman temple.

  • Alex

    The pledge of allegiance really gets me. I don’t pledge my allegiance to some flag. I pledge it to God. It really bothers me that you’re expected to put your hand over your heart while saying it too, like it’s some sort of scripture or prayer. 

  • Ryan

    The default position that the State is infallible.  So often I hear, “well it is the law”, as if somehow that means we dont need to be or worse are not allowed to be critical of said law. The other I run into is the alleged omniscience of the State, especially in regards to war.  ”We have to trust them on Iraq, they know more than we do”.  Ummmm, no I dont.

  • Shea

    The belief that God ordains any form of political government. All authority in heaven and earth has been given to Christ. He doesn’t dole it out to others. 

  • Benjamin Stafford

    Great article, Norman!  You are spot on!  Have you heard of “Beauty will Save the World” by Brian Zahnd? It’d be right down your ally.

  • Scott Geer II

    Let’s be honest now…  Isn’t Ron Paul worshiped by Libertarians as much as Abe Lincoln is by the liberals?  His TV commercial called, “The One” really confirmed that for me (“The One” A.K.A. Neo (The Matrix) who is a messiah / type of Christ).  Too often (myself included) see Ron Paul as our saviour and forget who the true Messiah is. 

  • http://libertarianchristians.com Norman Horn

    Scott, I think you make a very good point, because as great as Ron Paul is, he is no savior. In fact, I’m pretty certain not even Ron sees himself like this. Thank goodness it wasn’t the campaign who put together that “The One” video. “Put not your hope in princes…”

    You won’t find any Ron Paul worship around here… ;-)

  • Ryan

    I find it laughable and ironic that the same Christians that boast about our need to follow Romans 13 (as they understand it), also support the American Revolution.  Especially in light of the fact that King George III was hardly as tyrannical as many of the US Presidents since Lincoln.

    If Romans 13 requires 100% statist fidelity, than the very genesis of our nation was one borne out of sin and violation of Romans 13.

  • DavidS

    What about World War II as the holy and just war, with the US intentions as pure.
    My father’s sentiment is “If it wasn’t for the bravery of our soldiers and military during the 1940′s, we’d all be speaking German or Japanese”

    Really?

  • DavidS

    What about the abdication of problem-solving to the politicians or bureacrats?
    How could we possibly solve anything outside of their wise and divine influence?

  • http://libertarianchristians.com Norman Horn

     Ooooh that’s a good one!

  • http://libertarianchristians.com Norman Horn

     Ooooh that’s a good one!

  • http://libertarianchristians.com Norman Horn

    This is so true, total cognitive dissonance!

  • http://libertarianchristians.com Norman Horn

    This is so true, total cognitive dissonance!

  • Michael Richards

    There is a justification for the American Revolution within the confines of Romans 13. The goal of the Revolution was to defend the rights of the states against the royal usurpation by the King of England. As the check list of abuses  in the Declaration of Independence states, “He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.” Technically speaking, by repulsing the king of England, the American states were declaring that their rightful rulers were not the English king but their own state governments respectively. They basically held that England had no real authority over the powers of their local governments. So rebelling against England was an act of service to their own respective governments already pre-established even before England’s authority was marked in the colonies.

     This is in contrast to the French Revolution which sought the overthrow of the governing authority by the French population. Their ultimate goal was to completely destroy and replace an already existing order which was considered by most in France to be stable and well-known (this is not only the government that the French revolutionaries tried to overthrow, but the whole of society and even the Christian religion). The founders of the US were not trying to overthrow the King of England, but preserve their own established authorities within the states. So no, there is justification for the Revolution within the confines of Romans 13 (It would be good to compare the US with Israel in the Judges period for greater clarity on this issue. Israel, much like the US, sought to preserve their authorities in Israel by eliminating conquerors within their own borders).

  • Ryan

    Clearly your acute understanding of American, British, and French History is better than mine.  I am almost certain that most Christians are unaware of the nuances you expounded (regarding American Colonial Federalism) and how they allow for a Romans 13 justification.  Your juxtaposition of the American Revolution with the French Revolution was brilliant.

    Therefore, I retract the nonsense I spewed forth and ask that you forgive me for commenting on matters that I know nothing of.

Who is behind LCC?

Norman Horn is the creator and primary writer for LCC. Learn a little bit about him in the About Page. You can write him a note or ask a question at the Contact Page. Follow him on Twitter.

Photobucket

×

Need a good read? Check out our bookstore!