Bonus: Should Christian Libertarians Reject Biblical Inerrancy?

Summary – Should Christian Libertarians Reject Biblical Inerrancy?

A reading of Kerry Baldwin’s article on biblical inerrancy, which discusses a blog post by Pete Enns in which he says why he believes the Bible has errors, and no one is obligated to obey Romans 13. Resources for a better (non-biblicist) view of inerrancy and a better view of Romans 13 are recommended. The hosts also give an update about new episodes.

https://reformedlibertarians.com/bonusB

Main Points of Discussion

Additional Resources

• “Does Biblical Inerrancy Threaten Libertarianism?” by Kerry Baldwin
• Episode 14 of The Reformed Libertarians Podcast, Does Political Representation Make Sense?, with Gerard Casey
• Note on the dangers of biblicism by Terry Johnson and Shane Lems
• Different views of biblical inerrancy by Kam Weng Ng
• “The Framework Interpretation of Creation Days” by Lee Irons
• “The Truthfulness of Scripture” by Michael Horton
• The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy
• “Well-versed Inerrancy” by Kevin Vanhoozer
• Video presentation on well-versed inerrancy by Kevin Vanhoozer
• “Can The Bible Contain Errors?” by Greg Beale
• Audio presentation on inerrancy by Greg Beale
• Review of Enns’ book against inerrancy by Greg Beale
• The Erosion Of Inerrancy by Greg Beale
  https://amazon.com/dp/1433502038
• “Romans 13: A Reformed View” by Gregory Baus
• Episode 2 of The Reformed Libertarians Podcast, What Does Romans 13 Say About Civil Government?
• Episode 42 of The Biblical Anarchy Podcast, Why Isn’t the State Biblically Justified?, Resolving Romans 13 Objections, with Gregory Baus
• Episode 14 of The Biblical Anarchy Podcast, Does The Conquest of Canaan Conflict with Anarchism? with Gregory Baus
• Reformed Libertarians Podcast hosts’ appearances elsewhere
• Also see a highly-relevant article by Kerry Baldwin on a pattern of turning ex-vangelical, especially as among women