Summary – How Neil Shenvi Gives a Gracious Approach to Critical Theory
In today’s episode, Doug Stuart chats with Neil Shenvi, a PhD in Theoretical Chemistry, about his work in Christian apologetics. If you think there’s a disconnect between his education and his work, he explains a bit about that in the opening to the episode, as well as the basis for new found expertise in critical theory. Shenvi’s concerns about the influence of critical theory rests in the influence (and resultant damage) to orthodox Christian doctrine by ideas developed by critical theorists. He offers a history of the philosophical discipline; many ways to discern the mechanics of it, how to think through and address the moving target certain nomenclature creates, and much more.
If you know very little about the topic, or believe it’s not as bad some say it is, this episode gives a great bird’s eye view making connections you might not have previous thought to consider. Shenvi has a very gracious demeanor and way about speaking on this topic; he’s sensitive to certain topics of valid concern (racism, abuse, etc), while recognizing the necessary distinctions and why this particular ideology is such a poison. Shenvi is apolitical in his approach. He comes at this with no agenda about politics or political theory.
Main Points of Discussion
00:00 | Introduction |
01:15 | About Neil Shenvi |
03:12 | How Christians begin expressing wokism and the common trajectory |
07:03 | What is critical theory? |
09:04 | How culture effects economics – the connection to Marxism |
11:15 | How does post-modernism relate to critical theory? |
14:11 | The convergence of critical theory and post-modernism (and the significance of this) |
16:31 | Robin DeAngelo is critical race theorist?? |
18:07 | Academics and activists |
20:10 | Difference between critical theory and critical race theory? |
22:18 | James Lindsey’s connection of critical theory to neo-Marxism? |
25:49 | Christians going woke are “just trying to deal with the poor and oppressed” |
29:55 | How lived experience can be wrongly interpreted |
32:48 | The woke have a “double consciousness” – lived experience is only valid for those liberated from their (white) blindness. |
35:32 | Wokeness is internally coherent even if it’s realistically incoherent |
37:48 | Are there any ideas that are redeemable about crt? |
42:00 | there are some isolated ideas that are valid truth claims |
42:43 | Error in identifying problems, or just a matter of solutions? |
46:55 | Interest convergence theory? |
50:39 | CRT’s biggest enemy is liberalism |
52:00 | Shenvi’s book reviews and his professional writing |
54:51 | Concluding thoughts |