I said last year in my article on "Romans 13 and National Defense" that I had been asked many times over the years to write something on Romans 13, that it was something I had thought about a great deal, and that it was something I knew that I must eventually do. Unfortunately, this is still not that article. However, because of questions about Romans 13 that I recently received and answered, I thought I would expand upon my answer here.

First, the text:

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. (Romans 13:1-5)

Christian apologists for the state’s military "defending our freedoms" and its wars "over there so we don’t have to fight them over here" incessantly quote their "obey the powers that be" mantra derived from Romans 13 in an attempt to justify their blind nationalism, American exceptionalism, flag waving, God and country rhetoric, warmongering, prayers for the troops, illicit affection for the military, and unholy desire to legitimize killing in war – as well as justify the state’s imperialism, militarism, and unjust wars.

But even worse than Christian warmongers reciting their "obey the powers that be" mantra, is the chant of "Romans 13" after some statement justifying war or the military:

The war in Iraq was a just war. Romans 13. The troop surge was necessary. Romans 13. Dropping the atomic bombs on Japan was necessary. Romans 13. President Bush did the right thing with the intelligence he had. Romans 13. Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Romans 13. Collateral damage happens. Romans 13. The Vietnam War was necessary to fight communism. Romans 13. My country, right or wrong. Romans 13. Soldiers are just following orders. Romans 13. We must fight them "over there" so we don’t have to fight them "over here." Romans 13. Osama bin Laden needed to be killed. Romans 13. Governments have a God-given right to defend themselves. Romans 13. Waterboarding is not torture. Romans 13. Drone strikes are necessary to protect Americans. Romans 13. Support the troops. Romans 13.

The chant of "Romans 13" is used to put a divine stamp of approval on U.S. wars and militarism. It is never used to put a divine stamp of approval on other countries’ wars and militarism, unless, of course, they are allied with the United States at the time.

Now, regarding Romans 13, I just want to briefly mention five things to provide a longer and more thought-out answer to that which I recently gave a young man who is now, thank God, out of the military.

First of all, it won’t do any good to explain it away, correct it, revise it, limit it to godly governments, or limit it to the Constitution. This is because there are two other passages that are even more explicit:

Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work, (Titus 3:1)

Submit yourselves to every ordinance of may for the Lord’s sake: whether it be to the king; as supreme; Or unto governors, as unto them that are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, and for the praise of them that do well. For so is the will of God, that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: (1 Peter 2:13-15)

Second, I continue to be puzzled that some Christians stumble over this. Only a madman would say that obeying the government in Romans 13 is absolute. Even the most diehard Christian apologist for the state, its military, and its wars would never think of saying such a thing. Although the way some Christians repeat the "obey the powers that be" mantra may make one think they would slit their own mothers’ throats if the state told them to do so, they wouldn’t do it no matter how they were threatened by the state. If government agents came to them and said, "Here, put on this uniform, take this gun, and go shoot your neighbor," they would likewise refuse and suffer the consequences. No Christian is going to make his wife get an abortion because the government says he has too many children. No Christian is going to accept every government pronouncement, support every government program, or blindly follow whatever the president or the government says – even when the Republicans are in control. Any admonition in Scripture to obey the government is tempered by command to "obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29) and the sixth commandment "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 20:13), which is repeated in Romans 13:9.

Third, what about Christians in other countries? Shouldn’t they also "obey the powers that be"? Aren’t their powers that be likewise ordained of God? What if their government instructs them to conduct drone attacks in the United States, bomb the United States, commit acts of terrorism against the United States, or invade the United States? Aren’t they resisting the ordinance of God if they don’t do it? Should all Christian soldiers in the German army during World War II have disobeyed orders and laid down their weapons when America entered the war? Christian warmongers are such hypocrites. They are very selective about which governments they think Christians should obey. What they really mean by their mantra is that all people everywhere in the world should only obey the powers that be in the United States.

Fourth, obedience is not really the issue. Obeying the government is not absolute when the government commands something that is contrary to the word of God. The problem with the former-Marine pastor of the former soldier who wrote to me and other Christian warmongers is in what they believe to be contrary to the word of God. It is here that we are at an impasse. When someone defends unjust foreign wars (are there any other kind?), bloated military budgets, torture, drone strikes, bombing campaigns, secret prison camps, indefinite detention, CIA meddling and black ops, almost anything the military does, an empire of troops and bases around the world, and an interventionist U.S. foreign policy in general as not contrary to the word of God as long as it is Americans are doing these things to foreigners and not foreigners to Americans, I say that he is a Christian warmonger who needs to rethink his position. So the issue is not actually obedience, it is what constitutes something contrary to the word of God. The real issue is what extent of disobedience is obedience to God.

Fifth, Christians who recite their "obey the powers that be" mantra and chant "Romans 13" when they want to put a divine stamp of approval on U.S. wars and militarism are falsely leading people to believe that defending US wars and military interventions has something to do with obeying the government. Obeying the government has nothing to do with believing everything the government says, accepting everything the government does, supporting the government’s troops, or defending the government’s wars. The US government hasn’t commanded any American to think or say that the war on terror is a good thing, that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are just wars, that US foreign policy should be supported, that prayers should be made for US troops, or that the US Navy is "a global force for good." And the government certainly hasn’t commanded any individual to go kill and maim on its behalf in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is no draft. No one was forced to join the military. And no one who bothered to study US military history for five minutes would joined before these wars began and not known that there was a chance he would have to kill and maim for the state.

In conclusion, I will just say this.

When I see a sign in a government-owned park that says "Don’t Walk on the Grass," I don’t walk on the grass. When I see a sign at a government-owned zoo that says "Don’t Feed the Animals," I don’t feed the animals. When a situation arises like when I see a sign on the Interstate that says "Speed Limit 65" while everyone is passing me doing 75, I speed up, but always mindful that some connoisseur of coffee and doughnuts might be lurking around the bend, just waiting to give me a ticket.

But when I am told to sit at a desk and kill foreigners via drone, fly over some foreign country and drop bombs, invade some foreign country that was no threat to the United States, indefinitely detain some foreigner in prison without trial, or occupy some foreign country that I would have to look up on a map to know where it was, I dissent and refuse to obey.

Originally published at LewRockwell.com on June 13, 2012.

  • Rod Freeman

    I appreciate your writings on this passage and hope you dig deeper into it in the near future.

    A question I have for you is this: On what moral basis would you feel compelled to obey the sign on the government park that says ‘Don’t walk on the grass”? Purely a matter of practicality, and the fact that you have no personal interest in walking on that grass?

    I think that its demonstrably true that everyone draws their own subjective lines when it comes to which laws to follow. Besides the fact that it is currently impossible to follow all government rules to the letter, where do we draw the line? And why?

    For example…. I don’t know anyone who reports income from used junk sold on Craigslist, but I’m advised that legally it is required. Selling used clothing at a yard sale is apparently illegal, as is having your parents loan you money for a downpayment on your first house if you don’t report that to the government. Legally you need to get a receipt for the $20 you paid that kid to mow your lawn last week. I’m sure there are a hundred other examples.

    I’d love to hear a reasonable, frameworked biblical approach to questions of obeying legislation that has nothing objectively to do with morals.

    Does Romans 13 have any bearing on this? Or does it all just boil down to personal conscience?

  • Callisto88

    God works in mysterious ways – I just started reading Eric Metaxas’ biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer and it does relate to this very topic. Would people be so callous to say that Bonhoeffer and the German Resistance movement should have just shut up and let the Nazis do what they wanted, without a fuss? I think not. And the early Christians were the very ones who stood up against the Romans for what they believed as well. 

  • Bob

    It is so sad the so many Christians blindly follow US Israel policy?! Zionism is not Gods plan!

     No war with Iran and losing more American lives, your fight is yours!! NOT the USA’s fight! Close to 5000 American boys lost along with two and half trillion spent to protect Israel from “WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION in Iraq and none were found? Remember!
    NOW It’s a Irans threat of nuc’s that they were open to U.N. inspection and none found, but Israel sits on a pile of nuc’s??? Is there something not fair about this pcture!Remeber the USS Liberty, the Lavon affair, Beruit bombings, Americans KILLED for???? Zionism??!More and more and hopefully more Americans and Jewish Americans are waking up to this looking the gift horse in the mouth syndrome! It’s obious there is no respect for the USA from Israel!GOD loves biblical Israel, and it’s peoples, but am sure NOT the Zionist goverment!Just leave the USA out of it, please! and maybe not being the only Halocaust victims also,, Israel won’t even regonize the Armenian holocaust!!!???? (4 million Christians killed for their faith, where were the big church groups, your own faith of people??) shameless self-centered selfishness with entitlement issues!AND of course your always a anti-semite if you speak the truth, even if you are a Jew! America FIRST!

  • It’s translated..thou shall not murder..as in criminal homicide..not ‘kill’.  Kill is just a poor translation.  Having said that however, doesn’t mean that blind loyalty to authorities, should ever be something to fall into.

  • Chris Leffler

    A friend of mine posted this on facebook for me to read because I told him he needs to have a marriage license and certificate for the marriage to be honored by God. He exchanged vows with his girlfriend, all alone in a bedroom, so they could CONTINUE having sex. He’s a Christain who’s heart is being attacked by Satan. He says I’m taking miss understanding what the scriptures are saying. Can anyone help me? PLEASE pray for my friend. His name is Robert.

    My email is Pewyman@hotmail.com