Welcome

Welcome to LibertarianChristians.com! If you are new here, you may want to see the About Page for a welcome message and more information about the site. Check out the posts on the right and the Top Posts page to get started! Don't forget to subscribe for free with RSS or Email.

Recent Posts

Archive for News

This clip speaks for itself.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
Respect My Authoritah
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

Hey Jon, didn’t I promise you Bush 3.0? You may not be a libertarian now, but keep this up for long and you may end up, oh I don’t know, like John Stossel or Andrew Napolitano…

But I’m still curious, why do “conservatives” want to oust Barry? Seriously, he behaves exactly like Republicans should want: he gives corporate handouts, he passes socialized medicine (remember Bush’s “Prescription Drug Plan” plus some), he encourages education (No Child Left Behind!), and most of all he ratchets up every war effort possible. What’s not for a conservative to love?

Oh wait, I get it. He’s a Democrat stealing the thunder of Republican big-government programs. That’s why.

Please support LCC by sharing this post on your favorite social network.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Related Content:

Categories : News
Comments View Comments

Warning: The material you are about to witness is graphic – because it is war. If you’re still under the impression that the U.S. Federal Government’s wars in the Middle East are “protecting our freedoms,” then I hope this makes you think again.

To introduce the video, Xeni Jardin at BoingBoing has written: “No single piece of video has made me more ashamed to be supporting this stupid, morally bankrupt, endless war with my tax dollars. No wonder my government (and others) wants Wikileaks shut down.” Words cannot describe what I felt watching this video for the first time, so brace yourself.

Video: Collateral Murder (YouTube/sunshinepress). Also available as a torrent: (short) (full)

Admittedly, there is ambiguity at first regarding the weapons these people were carrying, but there is no question whatsoever about what happened after that. Without provocation, these soldiers fired upon and killed civilians twice in under fifteen minutes. In the end, there are no excuses for this.

What makes this incident so horrible?

  • So these men had weapons – so what? They made no aggressive moves, there were no indications they were preparing to do anything, and for supposed insurgents walking openly down a street they were rather relaxed. That’s some strange behavior for people supposedly about to attack you with small arms.
  • There was no firefight before the soldiers opened fire, contra the dialogue. But when you’re flying a helicopter touting 30mm guns, everything looks like a threat I guess? You just want to go out and shoot something…
  • And that’s exactly what is really sick next. They are just itching to open fire again on the crawling, wounded man (who is the Reuters driver by the way), just waiting for him to pick up a weapon to justify going off on him again. As if a man bleeding to death on the ground with a pistol poses any threat to a chopper.
  • What really, really made my jaw drop was what happened next, though. After first part of the battle, a van comes to assist the wounded. The van was unarmed. The people were unarmed. Oh, and there are two children in the van as well. Yet, more indiscriminate carnage is dealt to these innocents by these soldiers, devastating the van with the children inside and killing ever more precious human lives. Thank God that at least the children lived.
  • They laugh at the dead. Like it’s a blinking video game or something. Are they dead inside? Or just animals?
  • They justify their shooting of children by saying, “it’s their fault they brought them to the firing line.” Really? REALLY???
  • The children were initially taken to the military hospital for treatment, but were promptly sent to the other local, not nearly as good Iraqi care center – despite having been just shot up by 30mm rounds. How very kind of them.
  • But it gets worse, because after all this the government suppressed the entire thing. They covered it up and suppressed the data. Really, if their cause was so just, what did they have to hide? The efforts undertaken to push this under the rug should be a clear indictment of wrongdoing.

Brian Martinez at the Libertarian Standard wrote:

Perhaps someone can explain how we’re any more free now, because I’m having difficulty seeing it.  In fact there’s no rational explanation for how these wars, or any wars, have ever helped us maintain our freedoms.  We seem to be less free now than at any point in the past 200 years, and it’s not because radical Muslims hate our wealth and decadent culture.  It’s because our rulers must continually find “enemies” to threaten us, from within and without, to maintain their authority.

This video is the tip of the iceberg. WikiLeaks and Reuters worked for years to get it into the open, can you imagine what else is out there waiting to be discovered? The only reason this video has been revealed is that certain people were important to Reuters. How many people have died and their stories been suppressed – people who have no advocates? Think about that for a minute.

War is hell, and brings out the worst in everyone. There is no honor in killing. Stop supporting mass murder.

More coverage:

BoingBoing: Part 1 and Part 2
LewRockwell.com
The Libertarian Standard
WikiLeaks
Collateral Murder

Please support LCC by sharing this post on your favorite social network.

Tags: , , , ,

Related Content:

Categories : Media, News
Comments View Comments

From an Austin resident and Christian libertarian

Jay Janner, Austin American Statesman On February 18, 2010, Joe Stack set the final plan of his life in motion. At roughly 9:00 a.m., he burned his house down, traumatizing his wife and child. By 9:40 a.m., Stack had departed from the Georgetown airport 21 miles from his home in his Piper Cherokee PA 28 airplane. At 9:56 a.m., he crashed this plane into an IRS office near the intersection of Mopac Boulevard and U.S. Route 183 in Austin, Texas, ending his own life, killing one individual, seriously wounding others, and causing immeasurable grief to many more. Read More→

Please support LCC by sharing this post on your favorite social network.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Related Content:

Categories : Articles
Comments View Comments

Scott Brown’s recent Republican victory in the Massachusetts Senate race has been headlining news all over the nation the past two days. Some are calling it a “repudiation of the Democrats” and “the end of the Age of Obama.” The Tea Party Movement considers it a big-win for them (though not all of them). Even some libertarians are loving the news. With all due respect to these folks, this is all pure nonsense.

Scott Brown may not be like all the other Democrats, but he’s just as socialist. So what if he doesn’t like ObamaCare? He continues to support MittCare in Massachusetts. He voted for it. According to Wes at THL, Mr. Brown simply thinks that the government could “do better” than ObamaCare, which should be read as “we need more MittCare – on a national level!” From a speech Brown gave today:

"I voted for health care here…. we’re past campaign mode and I think it’s important for everyone to get some form of health care. So to offer a basic plan for everyone I think is important… there are some very good things in the national health care plan that is being proposed"

Obama may not have his 60 votes in the Senate anymore, but it doesn’t really matter in the long run. More than likely, Brown will just assist getting a bill just as bad as ObamaCare, if not worse, passed.

Scott Brown clearly believes in continuing to use the Federal Government’s military might to invade, occupy and force sanctions upon other nations. OnTheIssues.org notes that he wants 30,000 more invaders to go to the Middle East, and that they need to stay until they “finish the job.”

Oh yeah, and he also believes that torture is ok.

Eric Fehrnstrom, Brown’s top strategist, told National Review, “but from our own internal polling, the more potent issue here in Massachusetts was terrorism and the treatment of enemy combatants.” Whether or not Fehrnstrom’s point is true (some have told me, and I believe them, that health care was the main issue), Brown is committed to “enhanced interrogation” as good and right – and so are plenty of other Massachusetts voters, apparently.

That the Tea Party Movement bought into this guy is ridiculous. It’s either a sign of weakness on their part or infiltration from the exact people they have been trying to replace – let’s hope it’s the former, and that the lesson is quickly learned. Tea Partiers know something is wrong, but they sometimes just don’t see the problem in context. I hope those of us who are consistent libertarians can take the opportunity to show them that the State is not the answer – it has never been the answer.

There is only one potentially decent thing to come out of this event: it sends some minor shockwaves through the establishment. But this is only a minor setback to the shadowy puppet masters. We should remember that the two-party system is just a one party system with twin faces. Fundamentally, they support the same policies and do the same things while duping the public into thinking that replacing the blokes every few years is going to make the difference. As historian Caroll Quigley notes in Tragedy and Hope, it most certainly won’t:

The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to the doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extreme shifts in policy.… Either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.

Let Scott Brown’s victory be a lesson to us all: We cannot count on the establishment to support freedom.

UPDATE: And for some more funky Tea Party news, check this blurb from Lew Rockwell.

UPDATE: The moment of truth…

Please support LCC by sharing this post on your favorite social network.

Tags: , , , ,

Related Content:

Categories : Articles
Comments View Comments
Dec
07

Happy Birthday LCC!

Posted by: Norman | Comments View Comments

image

It came and went without much ado, but lo and behold – LibertarianChristians.com is now  one year old! Yes indeed, there have been over 200 posts since that first fateful day, and the website has grown beyond my wildest expectations. Have you been blessed in some way by LibertarianChristians.com? Please leave a comment and let your friends here know how you’ve benefitted from your interactions here at LCC. And make sure to keep watching over the next few days, because lots of cool things will be happening. (There are rumors of an official “contest”…)

There are so many things to be thankful for over the past year, here are some metrics representing the growth of the past year…

  • Over 30,000 unique visitors
  • Over 200,000 pageviews
  • 185 Gigabytes of bandwidth
  • Almost 300 daily subscribers!

And you may be wondering, what are they all looking at? Here are the Top 20 Posts of 2009 by number of pageviews:

  1. 40 Reasons to Ban Guns 
  2. Simple Arguments Against the Iraq War 
  3. 10 Things I Hate About Taxes #1: Lost Productivity
  4. Josephus on the Origin of the State 
  5. Podcast on Private Security with Gil Guillory
  6. Amusing Ourselves to Death 
  7. 10 Things I Hate About Taxes #2: Newspeak 
  8. Top 10 Books for Christian Libertarians – Christmas 2008 Edition 
  9. 10 Things I Hate About Taxes #8: Living in Fear 
  10. Podcast: Christianity and War Part 1 
  11. Perspectives on Religion and Capitalism
  12. The Fall of Bureaucrash
  13. 10 Things I Hate About Taxes #6: Withholding Taxes
  14. 10 Things I Hate About Taxes #9: Taxation is Theft
  15. Was J.R.R. Tolkien a Libertarian?
  16. The Libertarian Theology of Freedom
  17. Christian Libertarian vs. Libertarian Christian – Is there a difference?
  18. 10 Things I Hate About Taxes #5: Your Tax Dollars at Work
  19. On Rand and Altruism: A Defense of Christian Self-Interest
  20. New Testament Theology of the State, Part 1

To me, these data are astounding. Clearly, the interest of Christians in ideas on liberty is growing by leaps and bounds, and LCC has come to the forefront as a great place to learn about how liberty and faith work together.

You know what? I expect Year Two will be even bigger and better! I hope you’ll stick around and become part of this small but growing community.

The fight for liberty is generational, and we need to prepare ourselves for the long haul. I hope you will continue to come back again and again to LCC to learn, to grow, and to be encouraged. Again, please leave a comment below and tell your friends about what it means to you to be both libertarian and Christian.

Please support LCC by sharing this post on your favorite social network.

Tags: ,

Related Content:

Categories : Blog News
Comments View Comments

Who is behind LCC?

Norman is the creator and primary writer for LCC. Learn a little bit about him in the About Page. You can write him a note or ask a question at the Contact Page. Follow him on Twitter.