Feb
11

Militarism is not heroic

By

god bless troops and snipersChris Kyle, a former Navy SEAL, and the U.S. military’s most lethal sniper, was deliberately and fatally shot recently by another veteran while on a gun range.

According to Star and Stripes, Kyle had been awarded two Silver Stars, five Bronze Stars with Valor, and two Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medals. He is officially credited with more than 150 kills during four tours in Iraq; he is unofficially credited with up to 255. Kyle won’t say just how many people he has killed.

“I don’t care about the medals,” Kyle told the Star-Telegram in a 2012 interview. “I didn’t do it for the money or the awards. I did it because I felt like it was something that needed to be done and it was honorable.”

I blogged about Kyle twice last year, once in January and once in February. I included this quote from him:

It was my duty to shoot the enemy, and I don’t regret it. My regrets are for the people I couldn’t save: Marines, soldiers, buddies. I’m not naive, and I don’t romanticize war. The worst moments of my life have come as a SEAL. But I can stand before God with a clear conscience about doing my job.

And also this excerpt from his book, American Sniper: The Autobiography of the Most Lethal Sniper in U.S. Military History:

Savage, despicable evil. That’s what we were fighting in Iraq. That’s why a lot of people, myself included, called the enemy “savages.” There really was no other way to describe what we encountered there. People ask me all the time, “How many people have you killed?” My standard response is, “Does the answer make me less, or more, of a man?” The number is not important to me. I only wish I had killed more. Not for bragging rights, but because I believe the world is a better place without savages out there taking American lives. Everyone I shot in Iraq was trying to harm Americans or Iraqis loyal to the new government.

Will Grigg also wrote about Kyle in 2012.

After Kyle’s death, I blogged that “You reap what you sow.” However, what really got apologists for the U.S. military in a tizzy was this tweet by Ron Paul: “Chris Kyle’s death seems to confirm that ‘he who lives by the sword dies by the sword.’”

Conservatives, naturally, because they are in love with all things military, were quite upset. But others expressed their “concerns” as well.

Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer chastised Dr. Paul, calling his tweet “insane,” and calling Kyle “a modern, American war hero.”

Another veteran said that “Ron Paul has been reading too much Laurence Vance.”

Senator Rand Paul responded: “Chris Kyle was a hero like all Americans who don the uniform to defend our country. Our prayers are with his family during this tragic time.”

Some libertarians weren’t too happy with Paul’s “social media strategies, or basic skills of persuasion.”

Wannabe-libertarian Glenn Beck (“I’m becoming more and more Libertarian every day”) termed Paul’s statement “despicable,” “ugly,” and “offensive.”

But there is nothing honorable or heroic about anything Chris Kyle did in Iraq. He defended no American’s freedoms. He didn’t fight “over there” so no American would have to fight “over here.” Soldiers who kill for the state in unjust wars are murderers, not heroes. As Future of Freedom Foundation president and Army veteran Jacob Hornberger recently wrote: “Since the U.S. government was the aggressor in the war on Iraq, that means that no U.S. soldier had the moral authority to kill even one single Iraqi. Every single soldier who killed an Iraqi or who even participated in the enterprise was guilty of murder in a moral, religious, and spiritual sense.”

Here is a simple test to determine whether a soldier is a murderer or a hero. There are only fifteen questions and only one of two responses is possible so you should be able to keep track of your answers.

  1. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and throws grenades at Americans. Hero or murderer?
  2. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and incinerates Americans with a flamethrower. Hero or murderer?
  3. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and blows up Americans with a land mine. Hero or murderer?
  4. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and blasts Americans to kingdom come with a tank. Hero or murderer?
  5. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and drops bombs on Americans. Hero or murderer?
  6. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and cuts Americans in half with a machine gun. Hero or murderer?
  7. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and launches missiles at Americans. Hero or murderer?
  8. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and shoots Americans with a pistol. Hero or murderer?
  9. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and maims Americans with mortar fire. Hero or murderer?
  10. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and fires rocket propelled grenades at Americans. Hero or murderer?
  11. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and shreds the flesh of Americans with cluster bombs. Hero or murderer?
  12. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and burns Americans to a crisp with napalm. Hero or murderer?
  13. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and destroys Americans with attack helicopters. Hero or murderer?
  14. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States and kills Americans as a sniper. Hero or murderer?
  15. A soldier from a country thousands of miles away travels to the United States via drone and performs targeted killings of Americans. Hero or murderer?

I don’t know of a single American who wouldn’t say, and say it fifteen times, that these foreign soldiers were murderers.

But why is it that when American soldiers do these things they are heroes but when foreign soldiers do them they are murderers?

Time for another test. Again, there are only fifteen questions and only one of two responses is possible so you should be able to keep track of your answers.

  1. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they wore a government-issued uniform?
  2. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they were just following orders?
  3. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they joined the military to serve their country?
  4. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they were patriotic?
  5. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because their government said America needed a regime change?
  6. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they joined the military because they couldn’t find a job?
  7. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they were just obeying their commander in chief?
  8. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they didn’t make their country’s foreign policy?
  9. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they were drafted?
  10. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because their government said there were communists in America?
  11. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they joined the military because their father had been in the military?
  12. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they just did what they were told?
  13. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because their government told them they were fighting a defensive war?
  14. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because their politicians are the ones responsible for their actions?
  15. Should we excuse foreign soldiers because they thought they were defending the freedoms of civilians in their country?

Then why do we excuse American soldiers for these same reasons?

U.S. foreign policy is aggressive, reckless, belligerent, and meddling. We don’t need a foreign policy that strikes a balance. We don’t need a foreign policy that we can afford. We don’t need a foreign policy that is like Reagan’s. We don’t need a foreign policy that is less interventionist. We need a wholesale repudiation of the past century of an evil and murderous U.S. foreign policy.

Originally posted on LewRockwell.com on February 11, 2013.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Categories : Articles
  • David

    I wouldn’t really blame the soldiers if a foreign country invaded us. Of course, we would be completely justified in trying to kill them, but the real people we should hate would be their leaders. I would even go so far as to say that trying to kill their leaders woul be justified… Which is probably exactly how the Middle East feels.

    Granted, the soldier would be most morally exemplary if they refused to go, even if it meant imprisonment or death. That’s a hard choice to make, and I understand why some people don’t. But those who do make that choice, not those who go and kill, are the real heroes.
    I generally assume, unless proven otherwise, that a soldier has good intentions when he goes, and is simply in error. If so, focusing our frustration on them is a misplaced focus. Its like playing chess and focusing exclusively on the pawns… you’re supposed to focus on the King. It is our leaders: guys like Bush, Obama, anyone high enough in the Pentagon to actually have any real control over policy, that are the real murderers. The soldiers are just tools.

    Of course, if I were to join the military, knowing what I know, and if I were to go kill people in Iraq or whatever under those conditions, I would be a murderer. I do think knowledge makes some degree of interest. If anyone JOINS knowing what they are being asked to do and why its wrong, then I would say they are murderers.
    Otherwise, its hard not to admire their courage even while you shake your head and wish they had a little more, just enough to actually say no.

  • Libertymike

    Courage is not a word I would attribute to a person who joins the biggest, baddest, best equipped military. In fact, any person who joins a state sponsored military or para-military organization is hardly making a courageous decision.

  • David

    In this context when I said “Courage” I had the risk to life and limb in mind, something that would admittedly apply to a mafia member as well to a certain extent. However, the mafia member knows what he’s doing is wrong. The military member typically believes he is protecting us, or something else. Which they would be, and he would be doing something noble, if our leaders knew the difference between defense and offense. The problem, of course, is that the sociopaths in the White House can’t tell the difference. I’m honestly not sure how much of that is the fault of the common soldier. If the common soldier were to say “no” he would go to prison and nobody’s life would be saved because of it. If Obama had a change of heart right now, thousands of lives would be saved. Logical deduction suggests that the majority of the blame (Right now, in 2001-2009 it was Bush) lies with Obama.

  • http://www.facebook.com/OhioRepublic Harold Thomas

    Norman, what you wrote is Christian and perfectly logical. Unfortunately, most Americans are deluded into a belief in “American exceptionalism” — which as I recall is what got the Germans in trouble 70 years ago…

  • http://libertarianchristians.com Norman Horn

    Harold, this is Laurence Vance’s work (for some reason the author does not show up in the emails, so if you’re getting those I apologize for the confusion). But yes, I think the unhealthy version of American exceptionalism (that America is superior and deserves to run roughshod over anyone it wants) is just horrific in so many ways. With the Lord’s help I believe we can begin to fight back within the church against these terrible notions.

  • David

    I really wonder where these people find America in the Bible….
    Actually, I have found America in the Bible, its called the Roman Empire. People think we are like God’s chosen people of the modern era, when we’re really just the Roman Empire and on the way to decline.
    I don’t see how people seriously claim to be Christians that believe the “American Exceptionalism” as you describe it. But hey,I used too.

Who is behind LCC?

Norman Horn is the creator and primary writer for LCC. Learn a little bit about him in the About Page. You can write him a note or ask a question at the Contact Page. Follow him on Twitter.

Photobucket

×

Need a good read? Check out our bookstore!