Oct
25

Do wars in the Bible justify war today?

By

From a biblical perspective, the worst thing about Christian apologists for war, the military, and the warfare state is not their willful ignorance of U.S. foreign policy, their blind nationalism, their childish devotion to the military, their cheerleading for the Republican Party, their acceptance of the national-security state, or their support for perpetual war, but their misuse of Scripture.

What follows are examples of some of the Old Testament Scripture verses often quoted or referred to before or after some Christian warmonger seeks to defend U.S. wars, the U.S. empire, or the U.S. military as a divine institution.

Abraham, "the friend of God" (James 2:23)," "armed his trained servants" to rescue his nephew Lot (Genesis 14:14).

The LORD brought the Jews "out of the land of Egypt by their armies" (Exodus 12:2).

"The LORD is a man of war" (Exodus 15:3).

The LORD told the children of Israel that he would "destroy all the people to whom" they came, and make their enemies "turn their backs" unto them (Exodus 23:27).

The LORD commanded the children of Israel to "destroy" the altars of the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, "to break their images, and cut down their groves" (Exodus 34:11-13).

After "Israel vowed a vow unto the LORD, and said, If thou wilt indeed deliver this people into my hand, then I will utterly destroy their cities," "the LORD hearkened to the voice of Israel, and delivered up the Canaanites; and they utterly destroyed them and their cities" (Numbers 21:2-3).

Moses told the children of Israel to arm themselves "unto the war" and war against the Midianites. So Israel slew all the males and "took all the women of Midian captives, and their little ones, and took the spoil of all their cattle, and all their flocks, and all their goods." Then they "burnt all their cities wherein they dwelt, and all their goodly castles, with fire." And "took all the spoil, and all the prey, both of men and of beasts." But "Moses was wroth with the officers of the host, with the captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, which came from the battle" because they "saved all the women alive," which had caused the children of Israel to "commit trespass against the LORD." So Moses commanded Israel to "kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him" and to "keep alive" for themselves "all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him" (Numbers 31:1-18).

When the children of Israel went out to battle, they were accompanied by priests (Deuteronomy 20:2).

Joshua and "about forty thousand prepared for war passed over before the LORD unto battle, to the plains of Jericho" (Joshua 4:13). The Jews blockaded the city and "utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword" (Joshua 6:21).

Joshua "utterly destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai" and burnt the city, with Israel taking "the cattle and the spoil" for themselves "according to the word of the LORD which he commanded Joshua" (Joshua 8:26-28).

The LORD sent Gideon to save Israel from the Midianites by smiting them (Judges 6:13-16).

The LORD commanded Saul to "smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass" (1 Samuel 15:3).

King David, a man after God’s own heart (1 Samuel 13:14), was "a man of war" (1 Samuel 16:18) who had slain "his ten thousands" (1 Samuel 18:7), and said: "Blessed be the LORD my strength, which teacheth my hand to war and my fingers to fight" (Psalm 144:1).

The LORD commanded David to go and fight against the Philistines and he would deliver them into his hand. David then smote the Philistines with "a great slaughter," thereby saving the inhabitants of Keilah (1 Samuel 23:4-5).

David smote the Amalekites "from the twilight even unto the evening of the next day: and there escaped not a man of them, save four hundred young men, which rode upon camels, and fled" (1 Samuel 30:17).

David warred against the Philistines, Moab, Zobah, Syria, and Edom (2 Samuel 8:1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 14), and "the LORD preserved David whithersoever he went" (2 Samuel 8:14).

Israelites from the tribes of Reuben, Gad, and Manasseh, "men able to bear buckler and sword, and to shoot with bow, and skilful in war," made war with the Hagarites. Many of the enemy were slain "because the war was of God" (1 Chronicles 5:18-23).

When the Jews rebuilt the wall of Jerusalem, half of the people worked and "the other half of them held both the spears, the shields, and the bows, and the habergeons" (Nehemiah 4:16-18, 21).

My reply to all of the above is simply this: And your point is?

Really, that is all I have to say.

What these imperial Christians are tying to say is that because the Jews in the Old Testament did X, Christians under the New Testament should support the U.S. government and its military doing Y.

But as I have pointed out numerous times, both in lectures and in articles, it is wrong to invoke the Jewish wars of the Old Testament against the heathen as a justification for the actions of the U.S. government and its military. Although God sponsored these wars, and used the Jewish nation to conduct them, it does not follow that God sponsors American wars or that America is God’s chosen nation. The U.S. president is not Moses, Joshua, King David, or God Almighty, America is neither the nation of Israel nor God’s chosen nation, the U.S. military is not the Lord’s army, and the Lord never sanctioned any Christian to go on a crusade, commanded him to war on his behalf, or encouraged any Christian to kill, make apologies for the killing of, or excuse the killing of any adherent to a false religion.

And as Philip Kapusta writes in Blood Guilt: Christian Responses to America’s War on Terror (New Covenant Press, 2011):

In fighting against these nations, the armies of Israel acted as God’s agents of wrath and were used to execute His judgments. The wars of Israel were always to be at God’s command, subject to His laws, and for the occupation and the defense of the Land of Promise. The children of Israel could only kill when killing in the name of God – that is, when killing in obedience to a direct mandate from God.

Unlike the children of Israel, who were brought out of Egypt and given a land of their own and provided with a set of laws to govern them within God’s divine kingdom, Christians have not been given a similar tract of land to defend or fight for. Neither have Christians been given a king upon earth who enforces God’s laws when violated.

Some armchair Christian warriors, evangelical warvangelicals, Catholic just war theorists, reich-wing Christian nationalists, Red-State Christian fascists, pro-life hypocrites, theocon Values Voters, Christian Coalition moralists, and Religious Right warmongers are a little more savvy.

To sound a little more scriptural, they will also quote or refer to some verses in the New Testament before or after they seek to defend U.S. wars, the U.S. empire, or the U.S. military as a divine institution.

Jesus told a centurion he had "great faith" and healed his servant (Matthew 8:5-13).

Jesus "went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves" (Matthew 21:12).

John the Baptist told soldiers: "Do violence to no man, neither accuse any falsely; and be content with your wages," but did not tell them to leave the military (Luke 3:14).

Jesus delivered a parable about a king going to war (Luke 14:31).

Jesus told his disciples: "He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one" (Luke 22:36).

Jesus "made a scourge of small cords" and drove the moneychangers out of the temple (John 2:14-15).

Cornelius the Roman centurion was a just man that feared God, gave much alms, and prayed always (Acts 10:1-2).

The Apostle Paul said: "The powers that be are ordained of God" (Romans 13:1).

The Christian is commanded to "endure hardness, as a good soldier of Jesus Christ" (2 Timothy 2:3).

The "armies of heaven" will follow Christ when he returns (Revelation 19:14).

Jesus Christ is depicted as bearing a "sharp sword" and using it to "smite the nations" as he rules them with "a rod of iron" (Revelation 19:15).

Again, my reply is simply: And your point is?

American military officers are not surrogates for Jesus Christ. Whatever Jesus Christ did or will do has absolutely no relevance to what the U. S. military does in Afghanistan. And if a Christian warmonger wants to do what Jesus did, then why not start with doing "no sin" and not having "guile found in his mouth" (1 Peter 2:22)?

Although the New Testament does liken a Christian to a soldier (Philemon 2, Philippians 2:25), as soldiers Christians are admonished to "put on the whole armor of God" (Ephesians 6:11), not Marine body armor, have on "the breastplate of righteousness" (Ephesians 6:14), not a Navy uniform, shod their feet "with the preparation of the gospel of peace" (Ephesians 6:15), not Army boots, and wear "the helmet of salvation" (Ephesians 6:17), not an Air Force pilot helmet. The weapons of the Christian soldier are not carnal (2 Corinthians 10:4). His shield is "the shield of faith" (Ephesians 6:16), not an M1 Abrams tank, and his sword is "the word of God" (Ephesians 6:17), not an M-16. The only warfare the New Testament encourages the Christian to wage is against the world, the flesh, and the devil.

Regarding Roman soldiers and centurions, isn’t it strange how that apologists for the U.S. military never refer to the ones scourged, stripped, crowned with thorns, mocked, smote, spit on, and crucified Jesus Christ?

And besides, there is a big problem with justifying the activities of the U.S. military because soldiers are not condemned in the New Testament; slave owners are not condemned either (Ephesians 6:9; Colossians 3:22, 4:1; 1 Timothy 6:1; 1 Peter 2:18).

On John the Baptist and soldiers, I have written a whole article here. Is not war the highest form of violence? On Romans 13, I have written articles here and here.

When all else fails, the Bible does say there is "a time of war" (Ecclesiastes 3:8). But of course, that doesn’t justify the war in Iraq, even though Jerry Falwell implied it did.

To hear some Christians talk about war and the military just like Republican politicians, one gets the impression they think the GOP is God’s Own Party instead of a pack of rabid war-crazed defenders of militarism and empire.

Which is worse, "deceived" Muslims using the Koran to justify jihad, suicide bombers, and IED attacks or "enlightened" Christians using the Bible to justify war, torture, and drone strikes? The answer should be quite obvious.

Originally posted on LewRockwell.com on October 25, 2012.

Tags: , , , , ,
Categories : Articles
  • Paul

    I’m definitely sympathetic to the view that the US military (more specifically US politicians and bureaucrats) abuse their power, seek out mischief, meddle in others affairs where they have no business, and often kill innocents. I favor dramatic cuts in military spending (say cutting close to 50% of it’s current budget) and removing our bases and troops from most of their outposts in the world. But you go too far in this article. Your ridicule of many well-meaning (even if dramatically mis-guided in your view) Christians is simply demeaning and shows a type of demagoguery and “holier (or smarter if you prefer that)-than-thou” mentality. Not being an anarchist and believing that in limited circumstances there can be justified use of violence to prevent greater violence does not disqualify one from being a Christian or opposing large aggressive military interventions.

    Furthermore, the brusque delivery of extreme views (and your views presented in this article are extreme) will not win many over to your cause or even do credit to what good ideas you have.

  • jhop432

    God has a plan. According to Jesus Christ He has always had a plan from “the very beginning”. Everything that the Bible teaches points to that final plan and its fulfillment. Once that Plan, or new Law or Covenent, was established there was no further need for many of the commandments directed to the Israelite nation of the Old Testament. Our reading of those Old Testament accounts is for study and spiritual edification only.

    The old Jewish nation of Israel can best be explained as a “model” or an earthly representation of the Kingdom of God as it relates to the Father and His dwelling place in Heaven.

    Premillenialists who support wars allied with modern day Israel somehow miss the point of the Old Testament. They place too much importance on the land (dirt) within the invisible borders of the secular nation of Israel where Christ supposedly will return literally as a king. The point of a King (Jesus Christ) and His Kingdom (the Church) was spiritual and of a heavenly nature.

    As almost a side note, another example of scriptural obsolescence (in addition to commandments to go to war as an expired nation of Israel) are miracles. God no longer has any need for miraculous gifts or prophecies. Prophecies pointed forward to the upcoming life and death of Jesus Christ. Miracles in the early church functioned in order to spark growth of the “fledgling” Church after its establishment on the day of Pentecost. This is not to say God does not or has not allowed or caused miracles to happen but it definitely would not be for any of man’s enjoyment or purposes.

  • GrayCat

    Thanks for saying what needs to be said — shouted from the rooftops, if not the pulpits in this country!

    No one wants to consider 2 Chronicles 20; Romans 12; 1 John. Or the facts that David — the man after God’s own heart — was prevented from building the Temple, because he was a man of war and had blood on his hands.

    And as soon as Solomon finished the Temple, he fell into dissipation and sin. And his murderous, spiteful, arrogant son caused the split of Israel into Israel and Judah, because of his violence and willingness to shed blood. God ended up destroying both kingdoms.

    Jesus said: “You have heard it said . . . But I say to you . . .” Ever read carefully the full Sermon on the Mount — Matthew 5 – 7, and His excoriation of the religious leaders in Matthew 23?

    Where in “Greater love has no man than that he lay down his life for his friends” does it imply to kill? Jesus’ meaning and example was His own crucifixion.

    Dr. Vance cites a couple of verses in Revelation 19. I wonder how many people actually understand what they’re reading in that chapter? No one in the armies of heaven following their King is armed. And the King Himself is armed with one thing: the Sword of the Spirit, the Word of God, coming out of His mouth, and whom He is.

    So where does that leave us Christians? Our plain examples are ALL of non-violence, with only one weapon permitted: the very Word of God.

    Jesus said to the religious leaders that for all their “knowledge” of Scripture they were unlearned. He commanded them to “go, and learn what this means: I would have mercy rather than sacrifice.” First John is plain throughout that anyone who even hates has already committed murder, and Christ is not in him.

    How is it possible to reconcile the Fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5), and the Wisdom of God (James) with violence, coercion, and war?

    Why do we ignore and not teach these fundamental Christian principles?

  • L Kaz

    I am often reminded of the following Scripture when I hear Christians call for the blood of the infidel:

    Luke 9:51-55
    51 As the time approached for him to be taken up to heaven, Jesus resolutely set out for Jerusalem. 52 And he sent messengers on ahead, who went into a Samaritan village to get things ready for him; 53 but the people there did not welcome him, because he was heading for Jerusalem. 54 When the disciples James and John saw this, they asked, “Lord, do you want us to call fire down from heaven to destroy them?” 55 But Jesus turned and rebuked them. 56 Then he and his disciples went to another village.

    Matthew Henry gives good explanation – Jesus speaking:
    “You do not consider what a good spirit, directly contrary to this, you should be of. Surely you have yet to learn, though you have been so long learning, what the spirit of Christ and Christianity is. Have you not been taught to love your enemies, and to bless them that curse you, and to call for grace from heaven, not fire from heaven, upon them? You know not how contrary your disposition herein is to that which it was the design of the gospel you should be delivered into. You are not now under the dispensation of bondage, and terror, and death, but under the dispensation of love, and liberty, and grace, which was ushered in with a proclamation of peace on earth and good will toward men, to which you ought to accommodate yourselves, and not by such imprecations as these oppose yourselves.”
    The same admonishment applies to the Church today…but teh practice of poligion (the unholy mixture or religion and politics) has clouded many heads and hearts.

Who is behind LCC?

Norman Horn is the creator and primary writer for LCC. Learn a little bit about him in the About Page. You can write him a note or ask a question at the Contact Page. Follow him on Twitter.

Photobucket

×

Need a good read? Check out our bookstore!